against unreasonable searches

The Eleventh Circuit then held that the government was not liable to the plaintiffs on the merits because the claims of intentional wrongdoing were defeated by the Supremacy Clause defense. According to the court, the defense applied because (1) the FBI agent acted within his discretion when he prepared for and executed the search warrant, and (2) the agent’s actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The family appealed the circuit court decision to the Supreme Court. The family argued against the Supremacy Clause defense and for a broad reading of the proviso. The family also requested that the Court determine whether the discretionary-function exception specifically bars suits for wrong-house raids. ดูหนังออนไลน์